The Mexican Republic of the Twenty-First Century, boasting more than a 100 million inhabitants, has evolved from many indigenous nations five centuries ago into a single national entity, with Spanish as its primary language. But beneath the Spanish culture and language, the indigenous identity of the Mexican people is unmistakable. It is manifested in their appearance, their culture and spirituality and, to some extent, in their language and traditions. Few of the original Indian cultures still exist in their pure and untainted forms, but most are present in some form in various traditions, customs and religious practices.
However, for the most part, the census has not been able to gauge the level of indigenous identity beyond the criteria of those who actually speak indigenous languages. In 1895, 26.09% of persons five years of age and older in the Mexican Republic spoke indigenous languages. By 1940, this figure had dropped to 14.8%. It dropped farther to 11.2% in 1950, 7.5% in 1990 and 7.1% in 2000. The linguistic status, however, does not necessarily explain if a Mexican citizen feels that he or she is an Indian by blood, by culture, or tradition. However, the 1921 and 2000 Mexican Federal Censuses stand out as exceptions. In these two censuses, performed 79 years apart, we get a unique view into the ethnic identity of the Mexican people.
In the 1921 census, Mexican natives were asked if they fell into one of the following categories:
The five states with the largest populations of Òind’gena
puraÓ were:
In the 1921 census, the status ÒInd’gena Mezclada con BlancaÓ implied that a person was of mestizo origin. Persons classified by this identity usually did not speak Indian languages, but still felt an attachment to their indigenous roots. The five Mexican states with the largest populations of ÒInd’gena Mezclada con BlancaÓ were:
The states with the largest percentages of ÒInd’gena
Mezclada con BlancaÓ were:
In percentage terms, the ÒblancaÓ classification was most
prominent in these states:
Seventy-nine years later, the 2000 census attempted to
determine the number of Mexican people who considered
themselves to being indigenous, without reference to
language. In
order to calculate the indigenous people, the census used
three criteria:
The five states with the largest numbers of persons classified as ÒInd’genaÓ in the 2000 census were:
The five states with the largest percentages of Indigenous people were:
In contrast, the five states with the largest numbers of persons who spoke indigenous languages and were five years of age or more were:
Of great interest to some people would be the states with the least populations of indigenous persons in the 2000 census:
In terms of percentages, the five states with the smallest percentages of indigenous persons were:
While many of the inhabitants of Aguascalientes, Zacatecas, and Guanajuato do have indigenous roots, the level of assimilation and mestizaje that took place in these areas over the last four centuries has diminished the original Indian identity.
The indigenous identity of the Mexican people is hard to quantify and classify from one state to another, from one linguistic group to another, so census statistics cannot be considered entirely reliable. However, the 1921 and 2000 censuses do give us the best view of indigenous identity, when compared to other census years.
© 2004, John P. Schmal. All rights reserved.
CONAPO, Cuadro 1. Poblacion Total, Poblacion Indigena, y Sus Caracteristicas.Ó
Schmal, John P.
Indigenous Mexico: A State-by-State Analysis (manuscript in progress, 2004).